Topological Fiber Bundles

The topological definition of a fiber bundle, local trivializations, transition functions, and the gluing viewpoint.

Mathematics / Fiber Bundles / Local triviality and gluing

Fiber Bundles notes
Sections

Topological Fiber Bundles

The formal definition

We now define fiber bundles formally, before specializing to vector bundles.

Definition 11 (Topological fiber bundle). A topological fiber bundle consists of topological spaces EE, BB, and FF, together with a continuous surjective map

π:EB,\pi:E\to B,

such that there exists an open cover {Ui}iI\{U_i\}_{i\in I} of BB and homeomorphisms

ϕi:π1(Ui)Ui×F\phi_i:\pi^{-1}(U_i)\to U_i\times F

satisfying

pr1ϕi=π\mathrm{pr}_1\circ \phi_i=\pi

on π1(Ui)\pi^{-1}(U_i). Here pr1:Ui×FUi\mathrm{pr}_1:U_i\times F\to U_i is projection onto the first factor.

The homeomorphism ϕi\phi_i is called a local trivialization. The condition

pr1ϕi=π\mathrm{pr}_1\circ \phi_i=\pi

means that the trivialization respects the base point: points lying over bUib\in U_i are identified with points in {b}×F\{b\}\times F.

The fiber over bBb\in B is

Eb=π1(b).E_b=\pi^{-1}(b).

The local trivialization identifies it with FF:

EbF.E_b\cong F.

What “locally product” means The definition does not say that EE is globally B×FB\times F. It says that there exists at least one open cover {Ui}\{U_i\} such that each restricted piece π1(Ui)\pi^{-1}(U_i) is a product Ui×FU_i\times F.

Does every open cover need to trivialize the bundle?

No. The definition requires the existence of a trivializing open cover. Equivalently, for every bBb\in B, there must exist some open neighbourhood UU of bb such that

π1(U)U×F.\pi^{-1}(U)\cong U\times F.

It is not required that every open set UBU\subset B trivialize the bundle.

However, if UiU_i is a trivializing open set and VUiV\subset U_i is a smaller open set, then the restriction also trivializes:

π1(V)V×F.\pi^{-1}(V)\cong V\times F.

Thus any refinement of a trivializing cover is again a trivializing cover.

Möbius strip The Möbius strip is locally U×RU\times\mathbb{R} over small arcs US1U\subset S^1, but it is not globally S1×RS^1\times\mathbb{R}. Therefore the open set U=S1U=S^1 itself does not trivialize the Möbius bundle.

Transition functions

On an overlap UiUjU_i\cap U_j, we have two trivializations:

ϕi:π1(UiUj)(UiUj)×F,\phi_i:\pi^{-1}(U_i\cap U_j)\to (U_i\cap U_j)\times F, ϕj:π1(UiUj)(UiUj)×F.\phi_j:\pi^{-1}(U_i\cap U_j)\to (U_i\cap U_j)\times F.

The change of trivialization is

ϕiϕj1:(UiUj)×F(UiUj)×F.\phi_i\circ\phi_j^{-1}:(U_i\cap U_j)\times F\to (U_i\cap U_j)\times F.

Because both trivializations preserve the base point, this map has the form

ϕiϕj1(b,f)=(b,τij(b)(f)),\phi_i\circ\phi_j^{-1}(b,f)=(b,\tau_{ij}(b)(f)),

where

τij(b):FF\tau_{ij}(b):F\to F

is a homeomorphism of the fiber.

If one chooses a structure group GAut(F)G\subset \mathop{\mathrm{Aut}}(F) acting on FF, then transition functions are maps

gij:UiUjGg_{ij}:U_i\cap U_j\to G

such that

ϕiϕj1(b,f)=(b,gij(b)f).\phi_i\circ\phi_j^{-1}(b,f)=(b,g_{ij}(b)\cdot f).

On triple overlaps UiUjUkU_i\cap U_j\cap U_k, consistency gives

gijgjk=gik.g_{ij}g_{jk}=g_{ik}.

Also,

gii=1,gji=gij1.g_{ii}=1, \qquad g_{ji}=g_{ij}^{-1}.

Local data and global object A fiber bundle can be described by local products Ui×FU_i\times F plus transition functions on overlaps. The nontrivial global information is contained in how the local products are glued.

Constructing a bundle from transition functions

Conversely, suppose we are given:

  • a base space BB with open cover {Ui}\{U_i\},

  • a fiber FF,

  • transition functions gij:UiUjGAut(F)g_{ij}:U_i\cap U_j\to G\subset\mathop{\mathrm{Aut}}(F) satisfying gijgjk=gikg_{ij}g_{jk}=g_{ik}.

Then one can construct the total space by gluing:

E=(iUi×F)/,E=\left(\bigsqcup_i U_i\times F\right)/\sim,

where

(b,f)j(b,gij(b)f)i(b,f)_j\sim (b,g_{ij}(b)\cdot f)_i

for bUiUjb\in U_i\cap U_j.

This construction is important because it shows that the total space EE is not usually guessed first as a product. It is often built by gluing local products.

Smooth fiber bundles

If EE, BB, and FF are smooth manifolds, a smooth fiber bundle is defined similarly, with all relevant maps smooth and local trivializations diffeomorphisms:

ϕi:π1(Ui)Ui×F.\phi_i:\pi^{-1}(U_i)\to U_i\times F.

The projection π:EB\pi:E\to B is then a smooth map, and locally it looks like projection

Ui×FUi.U_i\times F\to U_i.

Base space assumptions The base BB of a topological fiber bundle can be a general topological space. In differential geometry and physics, BB is usually a smooth manifold. Compactness is not required. If BB is compact, one can often choose finite subcovers; if it is not compact, the definitions still work.

Sections of a fiber bundle

Let π:EB\pi:E\to B be any fiber bundle. A section is a map

s:BEs:B\to E

such that

πs=idB.\pi\circ s=\mathrm{id}_B.

This means

s(b)Ebs(b)\in E_b

for each bBb\in B.

A section chooses one point in each fiber. When the fiber is a vector space, sections are fields. When the fiber is a group or frame space, sections are gauge choices or frame choices.